MarketDesign.ai
← Market Design Monitor
Core capacity calculation region · core-rdct-cost-sharing-methodology-rectification

ACER Decision 11/2026 formally rectifies the Core redispatching and countertrading cost-sharing methodology

Decision
ENERGY MARKETSMULTI-TIMEFRAMEredispatching and countertrading cost sharingcongestion managementflow decompositionpower-flow colouringloop-flow thresholdcross-border cost allocation
1Problem identified
2Consultation
3Proposal
4Regulatory review
5Decision
6Implementation
7Go-live
8Market impact
What changed

The source confirms that ACER adopted Decision No 11/2026 on 21 July 2026, repealing Decision No 30/2020 and adopting a rectified Core redispatching and countertrading cost-sharing methodology. Compared with the prior event state, the material additional detail is the confirmed decision date and the decision’s specific remedial focus: expanded reasoning for retaining power-flow colouring as the flow-decomposition method, plus amendments to Article 7 and related Recital 8 concerning the loop-flow threshold.

Why it matters

The decision preserves the Core framework for allocating redispatching and countertrading costs of cross-border relevance while addressing the legal deficiencies identified in the remitted proceedings. The clarified decomposition and loop-flow treatment affect how congestion-causing flows are attributed for cost-sharing purposes among Core TSOs and bidding zones.

Design impact
Price formation○○○
Cross-border capacity●○○
Liquidity○○○
Operational security●○○
Market participants●○○
Affected markets
Core CCR day-ahead marketCore CCR intraday market
Who is affected
Core transmission system operatorsCore regulatory authoritiesbidding-zone operators
MD analysis

This is a regulatory rectification rather than a wholesale redesign of the cost-sharing architecture. The main design consequence is greater legal and methodological clarity around the attribution of internal, loop and allocated flows. By retaining power-flow colouring and tying it to the zonal market model and preceding capacity-calculation processes, the decision reinforces a causation-based allocation approach rather than changing day-ahead or intraday price formation directly.

Rule / framework

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 (CACM Regulation), including Articles 9 and 74; Regulation (EU) 2019/943 (Electricity Regulation), including Article 16(13); Regulation (EU) 2019/942.

Next milestone

Primary sources

ACER · REGULATOR · 2026-07-22

ACER Decision No 11-2026 on the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading of the Core capacity calculation region

Open primary source ↗
acer-decision-11-2026